For any child growing up, during the 1970’s,
The wrath of Feminism had descended upon us.
Since, this very moment,
their dark ambitions have been quite clear.
Their goal is to reap havoc upon our daily lives.
And, to eventually seize every man,
And lock him into prison camps.
This might sound like an exaggeration.
However, this reflects her true intentions.
But, when Lobbyist Groups conspire these attacks,
They will not use a conventional approach.
Instead, they seek loopholes,
Which conveniently justify their actions.
************
(2) DECEIT
************
Men’s Groups actively discuss numerous examples.
But, this article will only touch upon a few key events.
In the 1970’s, Activists were teaching women to shun relationships with men.
The Extremists believed that every man would eventually resort to committing assault, or some various sexual offense.
But, needless to say, he ‘survives’ perfectly fine, without a partner.
Interestingly, Lobbying Groups base their ideas on common long-standing stereotypes.
Somehow, men will suffer immensely when alienated from his female companion.
Sadly, he might be trapped into reciprocating the advances of a younger girl.
After all, the older women have been taught to ignore men.
Aside from all issues, Lobbying Groups attempt to persecute anyone who disagrees.
It has nothing to do with any specific topic.
Women’s talk shows serve as a clear example of this mentality.
Daily compliance is a mandatory expectation.
And, if the law permitted, she would legally enforce these demands.
***************
(3) DISSONANCE
***************
The next step was to cause total dissonance between the genders,
throughout society.
This was initially devised with the theme which encouraged women to remove fathers from the family unit.
At one time, they had even discussed inducing all pregnancies,
Without determining paternal identity.
This idea was later replaced by support obligations.
Women of the 70’s were taught to avoid relationships.
This too was replaced by a more sinister tactic.
All contacts between adults would then be deemed “sexual harassment”.
And, as a result, it became common for men to refrain for several years.
Once again, the aim of “Women’s Groups” was to create total disharmony between the genders.
We began to see, numerous contradictory ideals.
The indoctrination of public areas, designated to Women Only.
While, at the same time,
There was admittance of women into the male privacy.
(example: female guards performing strip-searches at Juvenile Detention Centers for Boys).
This is not a terribly large concern.
******************
(4) THE ROUND-UP
****************
However, all pales in comparison to the following event,
Which has yet to become fully indoctrinated.
For decades, Lobbying groups were trying to create laws which required written consent from sexual partners.
They realized that, whenever couples dating, they naturally formulate intimate relationships.
Thus, it’s a mutually gratifying experience for both partners.
However, this display of affection is always implied.
And, there’s no actual “formal” agreement amongst the couple.
SO, Women’s groups devised an idea, that,
All undocumented relationships should now be classified as assault.
More importantly,
it doesn’t matter if these loved-ones are perfectly happy together.
Feminist doctrine will allow a 3rd party to become involved, and,
File charges against the man.
Here’s an example:
Let’s suppose, men and women are dating one another.
And, they have an active sexual relationship.
Women’s groups intend to make laws which require written contracts amongst both parties.
(needless to say, very few people would ever adhere to such a ridiculous idea).
This would now give the Feminists legal authority to press criminal charges against the man.
And, it won’t matter if the partner involved defends him, diligently.
**************************
(5) OUTLOOK OF DIMMING HOPE
***************************
This is precisely where our laws are heading toward.
It’s already becoming a reality.
There are cases when a school boy displays affection toward his girlfriend,
and, she's perfectly happy and accepting of him.
But, a Feminazi teacher attempts to formally charge him with harassment
(She would prefer accusing him or a larger offense, such as, assault).
3rd Party Lobbyist will give themselves the power to intervene.
This same rule will be applied to allegations of domestic violence.
Which also includes their loose interpretation of verbal abuse.
Footnote:
---------
Extremist Groups have an outlandish definition of abuse.
their interpretation includes just about anything.
Not surprisingly,
they've set forth an extremely broad guideline.
Perhaps, they consider simple “text messaging” to be a form of abuse.
As usual, the male being guilty.
OR, in contrast,
if he fails to answer the telephone, when she calls.
Once again, the blame would be placed upon him.
Thus,
Anything and everything could be classified as ‘abuse’.
In contrasting scenarios of two partners:
Perhaps, if the male invites a few friends to visit,
While he’s staying at her residence.
(In this circumstance, the male would be labeled as domineering).
Or, maybe, she wishes to have a large gathering at his home,
And, he would prefer not to.
(in which case, many would consider this authoritive male behavior).
Anything could be interpreted as abuse.
....Whether pertaining to harassment, assault, or anything else.
Needless to say, these strict rules shall only apply to men.
Whereas, she remains completely immune.
And, her ultimate purpose is to install punishment.
This is why such myths are perpetrated.
It gives Extremist Groups the right to impose strict laws.
and, to carry them out.
The End.
Presented by WWW.mensrightsmovement.net
*****************
(6) EPILOGUE
****************
A few closing thoughts:
----------------------
Everything described imposes all liability upon the male.
One such example were proposed laws criminalizing any male for having unprotected sex.
It's also somewhat interesting how everything is geared toward benefiting women.
This explains why there's such a loose definition of harassment or assault.
Such rules are designed to incarcerate millions of men.
Also,
this harsh doctrine will not apply to the homosexual community.
Therefore, when lovers meet,
only straight couples would require authorization.
And, solely the male could be punished for failure to comply.
Yet, all the while,
Those same Lobbyists actively force homosexual activity amongst her populous.
Women’s Groups actively become arbitrator of our Judiciary system.
Dictating rules which are not bound by simple logic.
And rules, which they themselves do not follow.
version 4.9 alpha.
back to Men's Rights Movement: page 3/ Articles.
MensrightsMovement.net
